September 4


What the Heck is the Rumination Subscale and Why Do You Need to Know About It

By Joshua Turner

September 4, 2023

Rumination is a term used to describe the tendency to think about negative experiences or feelings repetitively. It is a common symptom of several mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety. The Rumination Subscale is a tool used to measure the severity of this repetitive thinking in individuals.

The scale is a component of several psychological assessments, including the Response Styles Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale. It consists of several items that assess the frequency and intensity of unhealthy thoughts and feelings. The scale has been found to be a reliable and valid measure of rumination and has been used in numerous studies to investigate its role in mental health.

Key Takeaways

  • The Rumination Subscale is a tool used to measure the severity of the behavior in individuals.
  • It consists of several items that assess the frequency and intensity of harmful thoughts and feelings.
  • The scale is a reliable and valid measure of rumination and has been used in numerous studies to investigate its role in mental health.

Understanding Rumination Subscale

Rumination is a cognitive process where individuals repetitively think about the same problem without finding a solution. The Rumination Subscale is a measure of this tendency to overthink. It is commonly used in psychology and psychiatry to assess the nature and severity of depressive symptoms.

The scale is a part of the more extensive questionnaire, the Ruminative Response Scale. It consists of 10 items that measure how individuals engage in self-focused repetitive thinking. The scale includes questions such as “I think about how sad I feel” and “I think about what I could have done differently.”

Research has shown that it is a significant predictor of depression and anxiety. Individuals who score high on the scale tend to experience more adverse emotions and have poorer mental health outcomes.

It is important to note that it is a natural cognitive process that everyone engages to some extent. However, negative repetitive thinking excessively can be detrimental to one’s mental health. Therefore, the scale is a valuable tool for clinicians to identify individuals who may benefit from cognitive-behavioral therapy or other interventions to reduce overanalyzing and improve mental health.

Origins and Development of the Rumination Subscale

The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) component was developed by Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow in 1991. It was created to measure the cognitive response style associated with depression, and was later revised and expanded in 2001 by Treynor et al., resulting in the Rumination Questionnaire (RQ).

The RQ is a 22-item self-report measure designed to assess how individuals engage in rumination in response to harmful effects. The RQ includes items related to reflection on sadness, anger, and other toxic emotions. It has been used in numerous studies to assess the relationship between behavior and depression, anxiety, and different psychological outcomes.

The development of the RRS and RQ was based on the Response Styles Theory, which proposes that individuals differ in their response to damaging effects. According to this theory, it is a maladaptive response style involving a repetitive and passive focus on detrimental effects and consequences. It is thought to exacerbate adverse effects and prolong the duration of depressive episodes.

Components of the Rumination Subscale

The subscale consists of ten items that assess two dimensions – brooding and reflection.

Brooding involves the passive and repetitive focus on the unfavorable aspects of one’s situation, while reflection involves the active and analytical focus on the causes and consequences of adverse events. Both dimensions can be maladaptive if they persist for an extended period and interfere with daily functioning.

The short form of the scale, which includes six items, has been developed to reduce the time and effort required for administration and scoring. However, it may not capture the full range of experiences and may have lower reliability and validity than the full-scale version.

Psychometric Properties of the Rumination Subscale

Studies have shown that the subscale has high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.93. This indicates that the subscale is reliable and consistently measures the behavior across different populations.

It has also been found to have good construct validity, meaning it measures what it intends to measure. Studies have shown that the subscale positively correlates with depression, anxiety, and stress, suggesting that it is a valid measure of negative thinking.

In terms of test-retest reliability, the subscale has been found to be stable over time, with correlations ranging from 0.70 to 0.85 over several weeks. It suggests that the subscale is a reliable measure over time.

Role of Rumination Subscale in Mental Health

Research has shown that it is a significant predictor of depression, stress, anxiety, and distress. Individuals who score high on the subscale tend to experience more depressive symptoms and have higher levels of pathology than those who score low.

Studies have also demonstrated that it strongly predicts clinical depression and major depression. In addition, it has been found to be associated with anxiety disorders, such as social phobia.

It is important to note that it is not just a symptom of depression or anxiety but a risk factor for developing and maintaining these disorders. Therefore, understanding how it affects mental health is vital for effectively preventing and treating depression and anxiety.

It has also been found to be a transdiagnostic factor, meaning it is relevant across different mental health disorders. The repetitive thinking process is associated with various negative cognitive and emotional processes that can exacerbate mental health symptoms.

Cognitive Aspects

Research suggests it is associated with various cognitive processes, including memory, meta-cognition, and concentration. For example, individuals who overthink may have difficulty concentrating on tasks or may experience intrusive thoughts that interfere with their ability to focus.

Self-critical thinking patterns often characterize it. This can lead to poor bias in interpreting events and experiences, further perpetuating the cycle.

One of the key features is its focus on the past. Individuals contemplating negativity may spend significant time thinking about past events or experiences, often with a sense of regret or self-blame. This can lead to feelings of sadness, guilt, and hopelessness.

Emotional Aspects

Various situations, such as a stressful event or a perceived failure, can trigger rumination. When individuals obsess over negativity, they replay the bad situation, focusing on the unhealthy aspects and dwelling on their mistakes. This can lead to feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, which can exacerbate poor emotions.


When individuals do this, they are more likely to experience negative thoughts and feelings, which can contribute to developing these mental health disorders.

It can be a sign that an individual is experiencing significant distress, and seeking support from a mental health professional may be helpful.

Rumination Subscale and Coping Mechanisms

One coping mechanism is distraction, which involves engaging in activities that divert attention away from unhelpful thoughts. This can include exercise, reading, or socializing with friends. Distraction can help reduce the intensity of harmful emotions and improve overall mood.

Problem-solving is another one that can be used to address the underlying issues that contribute to the behavior. This involves identifying the problem, generating potential solutions, and implementing the best solution. This approach can help individuals feel more in control of their situation and reduce feelings of helplessness.

Self-reflection is a third coping mechanism that involves non-judgmentally examining one’s thoughts and emotions. This can help individuals gain insight into their thinking and behavior patterns and identify areas for growth and improvement. Self-reflection can also help individuals develop more adaptive coping strategies.

The goal progress theory suggests that individuals who focus on progressing toward their goals are likelier to experience positive emotions and less likely to obsess over adverse events. Setting achievable goals and tracking progress towards those goals can help individuals feel a sense of accomplishment and reduce feelings of hopelessness.

Rumination Subscale and Physical Health

Individuals scoring high on the scale are more likely to report higher pain severity and catastrophizing levels, which can lead to chronic pain. This is because repetitive thinking can intensify unhealthy emotions and increase pain perception.

Furthermore, chronic pain can lead to a cycle, further exacerbating pain severity and catastrophizing. This cycle can be challenging to break, and individuals with chronic pain must seek appropriate treatment and support.

Rumination Subscale in Animals

It is characterized by repetitive regurgitation and re-chewing of food. This behavior is often associated with grazing animals such as cows, sheep, and goats, who spend significant time chewing their cud.

Studies have shown that animals’ rumination behavior can indicate their mental state. For example, cows that spend more time contemplating have been found to be less stressed and have better overall health. On the other hand, animals that exhibit less overthinking behavior may be experiencing stress or anxiety.

Researchers have developed a subscale to measure this behavior in animals. The subscale includes various indicators, such as the frequency and duration of it and the amount of time spent chewing. Researchers can better understand an animal’s mental state and overall well-being using it.

In addition to its use in animal welfare research, it has also been used in animal behavior and ecology studies. Researchers can gain insights into their feeding habits and social interactions by studying the behavior of different animal species.

Rumination Subscale and Social Support

Social support can come in many forms, such as emotional support, informational support, and tangible support. Emotional support involves providing empathy, care, and love to someone who is going through a tough time.


Informational support involves providing advice, guidance, and information to someone seeking help. Tangible support offers practical assistance, such as financial help or transportation.

Individuals with high levels of social support tend to overthink less than those with low social support. This is because social support provides a buffer against stress and helps individuals cope with adverse events.

Social support can also facilitate self-disclosure, the process of revealing personal information to others. It can help individuals process negative emotions and reduce unhealthy repetitive thinking.

Rumination Subscale and Motivation

Research has shown that rumination can have a detrimental effect on motivation. When individuals contemplate the bad things, they may become stuck in a cycle of negative thoughts and feelings, making it difficult to take action toward their goals. It can lead to decreased motivation and a lack of progress toward achieving their objectives.

However, not all types are harmful. Some forms, such as reflective rumination, are beneficial for motivation. Thoughtful introspection involves thinking about past experiences and using them to inform future actions. It can help individuals learn from their mistakes and make better decisions in the future.

Potential Treatments

One of the most common treatments is cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which helps individuals identify and change poor thought patterns. This can also help individuals develop coping strategies for stressors and discouraging emotions.

Another potential treatment is mindfulness-based therapy. This therapy helps individuals become more aware of their thoughts and feelings and teaches them how to observe them without judgment. It can help individuals break the cycle of cynical thinking and reduce the intensity of emotions.

In addition to therapy, engaging in pleasant activities can help reduce rumination. Engaging in activities that bring joy and pleasure can help individuals shift their focus away from negative thoughts and emotions. It includes exercising, spending time with loved ones, or pursuing a hobby.


The Rumination Subscale is a valuable tool for assessing individuals’ rumination levels. It is a subscale of the Response Styles Questionnaire, a widely used measure of coping strategies. It consists of 10 items that assess the frequency of ruminative thoughts, such as “I think about how sad I feel” and “I think about what I could have done differently.”

Research has shown that high levels of rumination are associated with a range of poor outcomes, including depression, anxiety, and stress. However, not all reflection is terrible. Sometimes, it can be a helpful coping strategy that allows individuals to process and work through difficult emotions.

Overall, the Rumination Subscale is a valuable tool for researchers and clinicians interested in understanding rumination’s role in mental health. Assessing an individual’s level of repetitive thinking can tailor their treatment approach to better meet their patients’ needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between the rumination subscale and the rumination thoughts scale?

The rumination subscale and the rumination thoughts scale are both measures of reflective thinking but differ in focus. The scale assesses the extent to which an individual engages in repetitive thinking about their current mood or situation, while the thoughts scale measures the frequency of these thoughts.

How many items are in the 10-item ruminative response scale?

As the name suggests, 10 items assess an individual’s tendency to engage in reflective thinking. The scale is commonly used in research studies and clinical settings to measure it.

What is the scoring process for the rumination response scale?

The scoring process involves summing the scores for each item to obtain a total score. Higher scores on the scale indicate a greater tendency to engage in this type of thinking.

What are the subscales of the ruminative response scale?

There are three subscales: brooding, reflection, and depressive rumination. Brooding refers to repetitive and passive thinking about one’s problems, while reflection involves active and problem-focused thinking. Depressive rumination is a subtype of brooding specific to discouraging mood states.

How does the rumination response scale help measure ruminative thinking?

It is a widely used measure that has been validated in numerous studies. It provides a standardized way of assessing an individual’s tendency to engage in repetitive and cynical thinking linked to unfavorable outcomes, including depression and anxiety.

What is the purpose of the ruminative response scale questionnaire?

The purpose is to assess an individual’s tendency to engage in this type of thinking. It can be used in research and clinical settings to identify individuals at risk for developing depression and other harmful outcomes associated with the behavior.

You might also like